Philosophy Concordance - online philosophical quotations

Search results for phrase: number

During the first half of the present century a number of outstanding philosophers realized that language theory could profitably be viewed as far more than merely a means of studying one among the many human faculties, or merely sharpening the tool we use to philosophize - they realized that there is a sense in which philosophy of language comprises (almost) the whole of philosophy.

Linguistics and Philosophy, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/384.pdf

Another prominent example is that of the meaning of numerals: all of Peano arithmetic does not allow us to distinguish whether a number is the set of equipotent sets (as Frege, in effect, maintained), or the set of all the numbers smaller than itself (as von Neumann proposed), or a primitive object.

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

A number is not one of the things it can be reduced to, it is rather what all of these things have in common, it 5 is a number .

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

Everyone of us can be confronted (at once, but also during the whole span of his life) with at most a finite number of objects.

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

We can never encounter the set of all natural numbers; we can at most encounter a rule of the kind of '0 is a number x is a number, then also x' is a number'.

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

This nature of infinity has been repeatedly pointed out - probably for the first time by Aristotle, and more recently by several of the most outstanding 9 mathematicians and philosophers of this century - but many theoreticians simply ignore it. However, if there are no real infinite sets beyond those grounded in a finite number of generating rules, then there are also no functions with infinite domains beyond functions defined via finite rules.

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

There is no way of defining a function on an infinite domain, save by giving its values for a finite number of basic elements and then giving a finite number of rules to compute values for new elements from those already computed.

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

In some simple artificial languages there can be truth without meaning; in a universal natural language comprising an infinite number of truths this is, however, not possible.

Structure and Meaning, Jaroslav Peregrin

http://jarda.peregrin.cz/mybibl/PDFTxt/359.pdf

The terms '9' and 'the number of planets' name one and the same abstract entity but presumably must be regarded as unlike in meaning; for astronomical observation was needed, and not mere reflection on meanings, to determine the sameness of the entity in question.

Two Dogmas of Empiricism, W.V.O. Quine

http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html

The terms '9' and 'the number of the planets' name one and the same abstract entity but presumably must be regarded as unlike in meaning; for astronomical observation was needed, and not mere reflection on meanings, to determine the sameness of the entity in question.

Two Dogmas of Empiricism, W.V.O. Quine

http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html