Philosophy Concordance - online philosophical quotations

Its meaning will vary according as there is, or is not, a method of answering it. If we have no way of looking for it, then "contradiction" is not defined.

The question whether such a seemingly atomic proposition as "It rains" is molecular, that it is, say, a logical product, is like asking whether there is a hidden contradiction when there is no method of answering the question.

Although there is a sense in which answering "I" to the question, "Who has toothache?", makes a reference to a body, even to this body of mine, my answer to the question whether I have toothache is not made by reference to any body.

I cannot exaggerate the importance of this phenomenon for answering the question that poses the title of this paper.

A real connection, the rationalist must say, is identical with the non-existence of certain possible worlds, of possible worlds answering to a certain description.

Again, in answering the second question we need only note that the identity of the empirical events used as symbols is at best a necessary and by no means a sufficient condition of the identity of a language.

Before answering this question the Behaviorist turns to a second example of the unsatisfactory character of common sense modes of explanation.

That this is the sense and arguing of the author will further appear by his answering the question he in another place puts: 'Since all things that exist are only particulars, how come we by general terms?' His answer is: 'Words become general by being made the signs of general ideas.'

This applies even in the apparently simple case of answering questions: if the purpose of the answers is to deceive, their falsehood, not their truth, will be evidence of knowledge.

Instances in Proximity where the Nature of Heat is Absent Answering to the first affirmative instance.